Here is one such essay, submitted by a high school English teacher (teaching primarily Juniors) from Maine:
Prompt: Pick one social problem we face in America, and propose a solution.
Sex is becoming a problem. Kids are getting pregnant at early ages. They are getting STD’s.
You could help this by getting people fixed when they are young. They can have this reversed whenever they want kids. The only bad thing is that it could become permanent and you would never be able to have kids again. Or it could come undone and you may have kids early.
Another thing is to wear condoms. Condoms are 99% effective at blocking STDs or pregnancies. It not hard to put on and it use it right. Then again, condoms do break every now and then.
Abstinence is the best choice. There is no way to get pregnant or get an STD when your abstinent. The only bad part is you can’t have sex.
In my opinion sex is becoming more of a problem. So I think everyone should get fixed. Then we can do anything we want to.
So... obviously there are a number of problems with this example. The question is: how do we, as teachers, systematically tackle each problem without overloading the student with comments, and also ensure that we are not taking 30 minutes to grade each paper?
A technique that I use is to break the paper into two large subdivisions: format and content (each accounting for 50% of the total grade). In the "format" section I critique grammar, spelling, margins, font size, spacing, etc. In the "content" section I critique logic, flow, clarity of ideas, relevance to the prompt, etc. In terms of commenting, in the "format" section, I offer broad suggestions using a few examples from the paper; and in the "content" section, I simply ask questions or make a few general statements. This approach gives me a general plan of attack and direction for each paper, and it keeps the student from getting back a paper that has been completely scribbled out in red pen.
Here is an example of what the aforementioned paper might look like after I had made my comments:
Sex is becoming a problem. Kids are getting pregnant at early ages. They are getting STD’s.
You could help this by getting people fixed when they are young. They can have this reversed whenever they want kids. The only bad thing is that it could become permanent and you would never be able to have kids again. Or it could come undone and you may have kids early.
Another thing is to wear condoms. Condoms are 99% effective at blocking STDs or pregnancies. It not hard to put on and it use it right. Then again, condoms do break every now and then.
Abstinence is the best choice. There is no way to get pregnant or get an STD when your abstinent. The only bad part is you can’t have sex.
In my opinion sex is becoming more of a problem. So I think everyone should get fixed. Then we can do anything we want to.
Format
- Make sure to double space the entire paper, not just between paragraphs.
- Do not speak in second person (this is not a note to me).
- “Your” and “you’re” are not the same.
- Do not use contractions.
- Do not begin a sentence with a conjunction (like, "Or it could come undone").
- Do not end a sentence with a preposition (like, "anything we want to").
- Try reading your paper out loud to ensure that it sounds the way you want it to. This will help you avoid careless mistakes and awkward sentences.
Content
- Is sex a problem, is teen pregnancy a problem, or are STD’s a problem?
- You say that “sex is becoming more of a problem.” More of a problem than what?
- Should both men and women be “fixed”?
- Are there currently surgeries that could be used to “fix” people, or would new medical techniques need to be created?
- What, specifically, does the word “anything” mean when you say, “Then we can do anything we want to?”
- What exactly is “another thing” in the statement, “Another thing is to wear condoms?”
- Which solution would be the best? Focus on that one alone.
- If you present problems, you must also present solutions.
The highlighted sections of the paper correlate to the comments below, and they act as a guide as the student reads the comments. This way students are not trying to decipher comments in the margins or between lines. The comments are specific enough to give the student direction, but general enough to not write the paper for them and maintain the student's creativity.
In this specific case, if this were the final draft, I would give the paper a 35/50 on format and a 20/50 on content: 55/100 total, or 55%.